Saturday, February 2, 2013

Intro to Curling


Welcome, everyone, to my quest in understanding how to curl.  Before we get started, I want everyone to know why I chose this topic.  I choose this topic because, as a Christmas present, I received a free lesson to curl at Notre Dame University.  Yea!  Totally awesome!  I have been watching this sport only when the Winter Olympics comes around every four years.  About ten years ago, I even attempted to find any local curling leagues.  Unfortunately, the nearest one was located in Chicago.  I considered traveling a hour and half away to become an Olympic curler, but at last, I decided to become a librarian, instead.

Even though I have watched the sport on television, I really do not know a lot about the sport.  So, I am going to approach this topic through the eyes of a life-long learner.  I enjoyed all the information models that were reviewed in our reading.  For this project, I am going to try the I-SEARCH by Macrorie.

  • Selecting a topic - exploring interests, discussing ideas, browsing resources
  • Finding information - generating questions, exploring resources
  • Using information - taking notes, analyzing materials
  • Developing a final product - developing communications, sharing experiences
I would not try this approach if I were doing a formal research paper.  I am attempting to explore the idea of how to curl.  I am not going to have a hypothesis statement, I am probably going to have a lot of questions that need to be answered and explored.  With each answer, notes will need to be taken on the material or that material will need to be analyzed.  Then, I will share my experience at the curling center.  I will probably analyze how I did, but it will not be in a formal scientific way.  This information strategy approach seems to make sense for my project.

Before working through Macrorie's I-SEARCH, I wanted read more about I-SEARCH.  According to Macrorie, the most unique part of I-search is that the students select their own topics (Doll, 2003).  I would agree, it is important for learners to get excited about what they are about discover.  This also starts a process of pre-searching.

Reflection Moment:  The reason why I picked this assignment over the other is because I wanted to research my own topic.  This is an important lesson for teachers to learn, because I spend a lot of time working with students who say:  "My teacher wants me to research ____, and I am just not that interested in that topic."


In examining Doll's paper for evidence that I-SEARCH is successful, I came across some compelling evidence that strongly suggested I-SEARCH is both flexible and non-linear.  

          "... it is a nonlinear process that allows the media specialist and teacher to tailor the I-Search
          to each unique unit according to student learning goals and content" (Tallman, 2002).

In another article, The teacher-librarian as action researcher, Tallman explains that the I-SEARCH method is an essential part of information literacy and provides excellent outcomes (Tallman, 2001)  

Reflection Moment:  I am convinced that the I-SEARCH is an acceptable approach.  Both Doll and Tallman raved about its flexibility.  Three unexpected discoveries were made while reading the articles.  First discovery is that, seemingly, the media specialists love this approach.  I am glad to see that because I am a visual learner; more on that later.  The second discovery is the action learner.  Tallman phrased the term "action research."  I feel like I am going to be a reporter on the street for this project.  I like that term because, so many times, the general population thinks of research as a sit-down-reading process.  Lastly, Doll explained that I-SEARCH is a meta-cognitive process.  This is a reflection on how learners learn.  Okay, I am convinced; let's do I-SEARCH! 

References


Doll, C. (2003). Ken Macrorie’s I-Search Model. School Library Monthly, 19(6), 24-42. Retrieved on 01/27/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=502898579&site=ehost-live.
 
Martin, J., & Tallman, J. (2001). The teacher-librarian as action researcher. Teacher Librarian, 29(2), 8-10.  Retrieved on 01/27/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=502884594&site=ehost-live.



Tallman, Julie. "I-Search." E-mail received October 1, 2002.

Selecting the Rock

The first step in I-SEARCH, selecting a topic, can be broken down into three components.
  1. Exploring a Topic
  2. Discussing Ideas
  3. Browsing Resources
In the first blog, I already talked about selecting the topic.  I like the term "explore."  Reiterating what I said in the first blog, research is an action process, while explore exemplifies an action.  Also, the term excites me personally when someone says we are going to explore something.

In discussing ideas, I found myself pacing around the room contemplating whether I should narrow my topic to only one aspect of curling.  I began the thought about researching the rules of curling, but felt that would be too narrow.  I thought about doing a paper about the history of curling, but that would not teach me how to curl.  At that point, I realized that I need to link my thoughts to "what does one need to know before they take to the ice and curl?"  I consider my thoughts here as part of the intrapersonal learning process.  As I pictured in my mind how these papers might "look" as they were completed, I felt it was time to make a mind concept map which might clear things up a bit.  The mind concept map reinforces my visual learning and mathematical learning styles.  Librarians have been utilizing mind maps for research to break down complex subjects (Murley, 2007).  Murley states a mind map has some advantages of over traditional outlines in that they can include pictures, are non-linear, and develop branches of subtopics (Murley, 2007).

The following figure demonstrates that map.


Wow!  I think that looks nice.  I can now research my paper in segments.  I can find supportive information from different resources about each segment.  I still do not have the proper terminology, but when I go to look at resources, I can develop terminology and search terms.

I decided to do a quick Google search and Wikipedia search about curling.  Here are some of the resource links I gathered:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curling
http://www.curlingbasics.com/

Reflection Moment:  Should I be using Wikipedia for background information or information literacy?  Well, after reading Using Wikipedia to Teach Information Literacy by Jennings, I have no doubt that librarians should teach how to use Wikipedia.

          "by utilizing Wikipedia as a teaching instrument, librarians can help remove he stigma 
          from this resource and instill in students the tools and abilities necessary to be critical 
          thinkers and lifelong learners in using all information sources." - (Jenings, 2008)

Jennings points out that utilizing Wikipedia follows ACRL standards 1-5 and, in the article, gives the specifics.  I felt this is a really awesome article for evidence as why to use Wikipedia for information literacy.  So, yes, I will accept Wikipedia for background information.
If I had more time, I would want to find books about curling.  I found out that Ancilla College has no books on curling.  Hmm... I need to correct that problem.  Time to switch to another library, let's try the Plymouth Public library:
Curling for dummies by Bob Weeks  :         796.964 WEE   2006
For the love of curling Annalise Bekkering : 796.964 BEK   2007
I find it hard to believe that this library only has two books on curling!

While I did fully read these articles, I was taking mental flashes of the information segments.  This matches with my visual learning, and possibly with linguist learning.  A full discussion on my learning style will be included in the next blog.

I feel I have completed the I-SEARCH step selecting the topic. 

Reflection Moment:  Selecting one's own topic is part of the I-SEARCH process, but the learner needs to understand some information literacy practices.  Just saying "discuss ideas" does not equate to the practice of narrowing or broadening a topic.  Browsing resources might be overwhelming to a user.  Maybe recommending sources to a learner would help limit the confusion, or "research anxiety."  I consider myself an experienced researcher; therefore, broad directions, such as discussing ideas, and browsing resources do not intimidate me.  A college student might be a little overwhelmed by where to start looking for information.  I am still enjoying this process, and still think it is logical.  A librarian can refine it to the research level of the learner.   

References

Jennings, E. (2008). Using Wikipedia to Teach Information Literacy. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 15(4), 432-437. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=llf&AN=502937604&site=ehost-live.

Murley, D. (2007). Mind Mapping Complex Information. Law Library Journal, 99(1), 175-183. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from

   

Am I Skip or a Sweeper?

This post will be about determining what type of learner am I and what type of learning I prefer.

As you already read from my first two posts, I do a lot of reflection, and intrapersonal thinking.  I try to think about multiple ways to approach a problem before starting out.  At the same time, I am very visual.  In the morning, while laying in bed before starting my day, I visualize what I am going to do during my day.  I visualize how this blog will turn out.  My wife can tell that I am thinking without even looking at me, she tells me: "Paul stop thinking; go to sleep."  I ask her how she knows I am thinking; she says my breathing changes.  I do this during the day at times.  I will often just stare at something, or do something like type this blog, and visualize the occurrence.  I also have an anxiety problem, which causes me to replay daily events in my mind over and over.  Additionally, I have what I consider a semi-eidetic memory.  This is what saved me in pharmacy school.  If there is a picture on the page, I remember the page number and the information in relevance to the picture.  I remember an instance in the hospital when the emergency room called down in a frantic voice needing to know the I.V. rate to give a 2000 mg solu-medrol dose to give to a head trauma patient.  I knew it was on the top left-hand side of page 256 of the American Hospital Formulary book, one page after the picture showing an I.V. bag with a syringe of solu-medrol being pushed into the bag.  I can't do that all the time, but if I feel I need to know a topic backwards and forwards, I know pictures help me.  This is why I like the pictures Dr. Lamb puts on the websites.  I associate the material we learn with those pictures.  Websites do not have page numbers, but at least I know the material is somewhere with the picture.  My only criticism is that the slide shows, which are contained at the beginning of our lessons, all look the same when they first load in.  I would like to see a different introductory slide, so I could quickly go back and say that information was on that presentation.  I am also very good with numbers.  I admit I am very good in math; I think I scored a 780 on the math portion of the GRE without much studying.  The reason I feel that I am so good at math is that I have a built-in chalk board in my head.  I can draw, place numbers, see the problems, and keep track of the "carrier-over digits."  For some reason, I am attuned to doing math a different way than most.  For instance, if I am asked "What is 26 x 13."  I would write on my mental chalkboard 26 x 10= 260, and then 13 x 6 = 78, so 260 + 78 = 338.  Easy to do if one has a mental chalk board.

When performing the exercise in class to determine what type of learner I am, visual came up in both instances.  The survey exercise shows me equal in math and intrapersonel learning.  This make sense to me, as I seem to have three learning styles that work for me.  However, I prefer visual in some ways.  Although, I might also say visual with logic and reason behind it.  I am not the type of visual learner that can decipher art.  I can see patterns with logical meanings.  I guess, I am making an argument that just saying someone is a visual learner is still too general.  I believe subcategories can come into play.  I think different learning situations allow me to utilize skills given the learning environment.  I like the Kolb learning-style explanation.



Divergers
view situations from many perspectives and rely heavily upon brainstorming and generation of ideas.

Assimilators
use inductive reasoning and have the ability to create theoretical models.

Convergers
rely heavily on hypothetical-deductive reasoning.
 
Accommodators
carry out plans and experiments and adapt to immediate circumstances.         - (Koçakoğlu, 2010)

Sometimes I make things more complicated than they should be.  As I have tried to find articles for this section of the blog, I have sifted through articles trying to find evidence of some kind of mixed learning styles.  None of the articles I came across want to approach that subject.  All the study participants fit nice and cleanly into categories.  I DON'T LIKE THAT!  Something seems very 'fishy' here.  I did not have the time to look at the psychology databases.  Surely, somebody has written a paper on "I am not a Diverger; I am not an Assimilator; I am not a Converger; I am not an Accomodator; I am ME."  Maybe I need to write that paper :).

How does this play out in information inquiry?  I would say, I dance.  You probably think I have had too much go-go juice.  What I mean by 'I dance' is that I dance between learning styles.

Dance Step 1:   Examine the possibilities from many different angles.  Are there patterns or relationships? 
Curling.  I am out on the ice.  I want to curl, but I do not how to curl.  People in the stands are going to laugh at me if I fall on my face as I curl.  What do I need to know to curl?  Replay the Olympics tape in my brain:  the Canadians are out on the ice.  They have sweepers and a team leader pointing directions.  I see their footware.  I see a circle with a bulls eye.  I see the commentators talking about rocks pushing out other rocks.  There is a device that measures the distance from the bulls eye. - Intrapersonal Reflection Learning and Mentally Visual  Learning:  picture the question    

Dance Step 2:   Consider where they may lead mentally.  Draw connections between materials.
Mental Chalkboard time, classify this information:  Equipment, Strategy, Duties of Players, Scoring.  Abstract thinking:  History of curling? - Visual and Mathematical Categorization of Information

Dance Step 3:   Argue with myself as to which way I want to proceed.
What is a good way to proceed with this paper?  History - Argument for:  Adds more substance to the material, possibly why it has developed into the sport it is today.  Argument against:  Why add this information?  It does not have much to do with the actual process of curling. - Intrapersonal Reflection

Dance Step 4:   Form a search strategy.  Analyze the weakness in the strategy.  Always wonder if there is a better strategy.
Search the books.  Oh no!  The library does not have enough books on the information.  Analyze the date of the material.  Wow, the best book is 2007.  Is five-year-old information good enough?  Where else can I find the information? - Mathematical Strategical

Dance Step 5:  Gather information.  Analyze the information.
Okay, I got all my articles, books, videos, etc.  What does the information mean?  How do I put it together to make a coherent piece? - Intrapersonal Reflection / Mathematical Organization

Dance Step 6:  Presentation.
I need to figure out a good way to present the information.  I do not want the audience to be bored.  I will picture myself giving the presentation.  Play version 1 in my mind:  I am reading to an audience... they look bored.  Play version 2 in my mind:  I am using a PowerPoint.  Is that going to work for curling?  Hmm... Play version 3 in my mind:  Bring in an sweeper broom.  What am I going to do with it?  There is no ice in the classroom, but this could still be interesting.  Think about that some more.  Play version 4:  Bring in a curling rock, okay what you going to do with that?  Think about that some more.  Play version 5:  Take them to a curling ring.  Yeah, I like that, but is that feasible?  Play version 6:  Get a shuffle board, modify it with a bulls eye, and demonstrate using shuffle board equipment.  Hmm... I'll need to think about that.  Play version 7:  Make a video of myself curling in order to explain curling.  I could if I had access to the rink, but I do not.  Play version 8:  Find a curling computer game and explain curling utilizing a game.  Possible, but not sure.  Play version 9: ...  As you can see, this step plays over and over in my mind. - Visual Mental

The next step is not part of the Information Inquiry, but I did it as a student and will perform it as a teacher.  The reason I did it as a student was to become a better student.

Dance Step 7:  Reflect and evaluate if what I did worked.
I presented the material.  I had trouble in area X.  I wonder if there was another way I could have presented the material.  Conversely, that went really well, and I need to remember that is a good way to present X.  I could tell by the audiences faces that I had connected.  The survey after class told me I did this either really well or poorly. - Intrapersonal Learning with some visual components as well as some mathematical strategy

I believe this is an important step not only to understand if the students learned what they were supposed to learn, but also for learning to be a good teacher. 

Okay, I hope that gives everyone insight into my learning styles.

God help you all for trying to understand me, because my wife sometimes has a hard enough time doing so.

References

Doolan, L., & Honigsfeld, A. (2000). Illuminating the new standards with learning style: striking a perfect match. Clearing House, 73(5), 274-278. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=507696542&site=ehost-live.

Koçakoğlu, M. (2010). Determining the Learning Styles of Elementary School (1st-8th Grade) Teachers. International Online Journal Of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 54-64. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=49162695&site=ehost-live.

Image:
Enders A, Brandt Z. Mapping disability-relevant resources. Map. Journal of Disability Policy Studies [serial online]. Spring 2007;17(4):227. Available from: Academic Search Premier, Ipswich, MA. Accessed December 14, 2007.

Friday, February 1, 2013

Searching for Equipment

The second step of I-SEARCH is actually finding information.  I-SEARCH wants me to explore the information and ask questions.  Awesome idea!

After getting a general background about curling and making a mind concept map, I am now ready to hunt for information.  The question is:  where am I going to find good valid information?  What am I going to do with it when I find it?
 
I like Wikipedia as a background source, but not as an authoritative source. 

Reflection Moment:  Learners need to understand the difference between authoritative sources of information and non-authoritative sources.

Sometimes classes dictate which sources are in play and which ones are not allowed.  I want a book and a journal article?  Hmm... I do not think a journal article makes sense for this project.  I will allow authoritative websites, and, yes, I will allow YouTube videos that are conducted from a professional organization or professional interview.

I already know what books are at the library by looking at the online catalog.  I need to find an authoritative website on curling.  So, I need to develop a good search strategy.

Reflection Moment:  Learners will need to understand how to determine if a website is an authoritative source.

The World Curling Federation has rules and regulation about curling, located at
http://www.worldcurling.org/rules-and-regulations which has a PDF file located on the page. 
This is a 60-page document, so I know I will need to summarize the rules. 


WAIT!!  This happens in the next step.

Okay, we have a problem here.  We need to start taking notes and summarizing information.  Or, we need to keep track of where the information is located, so we can go back to it later.  I have worked it through both ways.  I think this will depend on what type of project on which one is working.  I know I will need a rule section in my paper.  I may choose to summarize it now.  I really think this depends on a learner's WRITING STYLE.  Here is where two worlds collide, WRITING and INFORMATION LITERACY.  One could make the argument that information literacy is non-linear; thus, it is okay to do either.  I think that is correct, but a writing teacher may not agree.  They may want a person to gather information and then piece the information together.

Upon examination of a paper on I-SEARCH, these two steps do seem to get blurred together.  Tallman writes:  Pre-notetaking:  After choosing the topic, the students wrote about what they knew, did not know, and wanted to know about the topic. On a worksheet split into three columns, they answered each of these questions. Students who chose a topic without much personal interest commented on how difficult this exercise was

For the sake of the argument, I will follow our information model and bookmark the website for later use.

Reflection Moment:  Learners may want to use technology tools such as social bookmarking to aid them in tracking information on the web.

I wanted to see if there were any good YouTube videos on curling.  I was hoping to find something about how to curl.  This was a good interview on scoring and equipment
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37PY5qvO_tQ.

I also found this YouTube interview on the mechanics of curling
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JU_6M9mek74.

Reflection Moment:  Searching YouTube is difficult.  Do you know how many curling videos have been made?  This requires some savvy navigation.  I tried keyword searches such as training and curling, lessons and curling.  All the time produced mixed results.  Maybe there is an information literacy piece as to how to search YouTube Videos.  Yeah, I need to look into this.

Lastly, I am going to take a lesson.  So, I will use this as part of my research.

Reference

Tallman, J. (1995). Connecting writing and research through the I-search paper: a teaching partnership between the library program and classroom. Emergency Librarian, 2320-23. Retrieved on 02/01/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=llf&AN=502838088&site=ehost-live.




Finding the Target


The next part of I-SEARCH is using information.  In this part of I-SEARCH the researcher is to take notes and analyze the information.

As stated before, I found information on rules of curling.  I need to summarize that information.  I would take notes such as depicted below:

An official Olympic curling game consists of 10 ends.  An end is much like a a bowling frame.  Just like in bowling, each player on the team shoots the rock twice.  The last rock shot in the end is called the hammer.  After the hammer is thrown, the rocks are scored (see scoring section). 

I am not going to drone on and on about all the rules. 

I already can tell I am going to have a terminology section.
A scoring section will be need be added, as well.

Scoring:

The rock closest to the center is counted as one point.  If the same team has thrown another rock which stops the next closest to the center, then they are awarded another one point.  However, if the opposing team has their rock as next closest the center, then no additional points are rewarded.

Reflection Moment:  An important point to take home here is that learners need to condense the material found and properly cite the information.

The Lesson:

I want to point out that at the lesson a lot of things about the mechanics of the game were not covered in any of the information.  For this assignment, the lesson is where a great deal of information was experienced and obtained.  I want to emphasize no matter of books and videos can possibly do curling justice.  I was so sore after that one two-hour lesson, and we only played 2 ends and practiced a little before.  The instructor said we had slid around for about a mile.  My upper thighs got a serious workout from launching off the starting position.  My arms ached from the sweeping of the broom.  I was not the only one coming out of that lesson saying "I did not realize how much curling could wear you out."  Yes, I am out of shape, but I still use my elliptical bike for 45 minutes, three times a week.  This lesson of curling was tougher than that.

Notes on the lesson will be good, but an interview with the instructor would have been more powerful.  Unfortunately, I did not get an interview.  However, I did get a few pictures.  Pictures will work, I wish I had taken more pictures, but I was so busy trying to learn that I did not get many.

Reflection MomentBesides taking notes, learners will need to understand how to conduct interviews, take pictures, and record videos.  While some of these skills fall under media literacy, they would be appreciated in the realm of information literacy.  The following picture, from Enders' article on Mapping Disability-Relevant Resources, suggests the relationship of media literacy and information literacy.





The following diagram from the article "Information Reserve to Media Literacy Learning Commons: Revisiting the 21st Century Library as the Home for Media Literacy Education" demonstrates media literacy skills which are closely related to I-SEARCH. 







References

Mihailidis, P., & Diggs, V. (2010). From Information Reserve to Media Literacy Learning Commons: Revisiting the 21st Century Library as the Home for Media Literacy Education. Public Library Quarterly, 29(4), 279-292. Retrieved on 02/01/2013 from
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=llf&AN=503000156&site=ehost-live.


Enders, A., & Brandt, Z. Mapping disability-relevant resources. Map. Journal of Disability Policy Studies [serial online]. Spring 2007;17(4):227. Available from: Academic Search Premier, Ipswich, MA. Accessed December 14, 2007.




Let's Play

The last step of the I-SEARCH is developing a final product.  This process entails sharing the research and having the ability to communicate the findings of the research.

In my mind, I try to start to visualize the different possibilities of presentation.  I guess, in essence, I am choosing a format.  Should I make a PowerPoint?  Should I make a video?  Should I just write a paper? Should I make a play?  Should I make a slide show with my voice?  Is there any other possible way to deliver and communicate what I experienced?  Should I make a website?  Should I make a Wiki?  I will be asking the questions as follows:

What will be engaging to my audience?
How much time do I have for the presentation?
How detailed should I explain each aspect of curling in consideration of my audience's attention spans?
What is my audience expecting me to deliver?
What is my instructor expecting me to deliver?
What are my capabilities?
What has past experiences taught me about utilizing each of these mediums?
Do I feel like experimenting with something new?
Can I make the experience appealing to all types of learners: visual, kinesthetic, etc.

Reflection Moment:  Learners will need have skill sets to be able to produce the products.  Many of these formats fall under media.  Parts of media literacy should be a part of information literacy.  If I get a job as a media literacy librarian, I will try to make this connection to information literacy.

If I were to make a final product for this research assignment, I would choose a PowerPoint presentation and talk about curling.  At some point in the presentation, I would try to get a curling starter block.  I would bring in a curling stone and demonstrate how to shoot a rock.  I would have the audience get off their seats if they want and follow along as we go through the motions.  The presentation would appeal to various learning styles:

"Regardless of the disadvantages, a PowerPoint can present opportunities to accomplish multiple instructional goals at the classroom or individual learning level, and slides can offer the potential of meeting the needs of students with different learning styles."  (Yu & Smith, 2008).