Saturday, February 2, 2013

Intro to Curling


Welcome, everyone, to my quest in understanding how to curl.  Before we get started, I want everyone to know why I chose this topic.  I choose this topic because, as a Christmas present, I received a free lesson to curl at Notre Dame University.  Yea!  Totally awesome!  I have been watching this sport only when the Winter Olympics comes around every four years.  About ten years ago, I even attempted to find any local curling leagues.  Unfortunately, the nearest one was located in Chicago.  I considered traveling a hour and half away to become an Olympic curler, but at last, I decided to become a librarian, instead.

Even though I have watched the sport on television, I really do not know a lot about the sport.  So, I am going to approach this topic through the eyes of a life-long learner.  I enjoyed all the information models that were reviewed in our reading.  For this project, I am going to try the I-SEARCH by Macrorie.

  • Selecting a topic - exploring interests, discussing ideas, browsing resources
  • Finding information - generating questions, exploring resources
  • Using information - taking notes, analyzing materials
  • Developing a final product - developing communications, sharing experiences
I would not try this approach if I were doing a formal research paper.  I am attempting to explore the idea of how to curl.  I am not going to have a hypothesis statement, I am probably going to have a lot of questions that need to be answered and explored.  With each answer, notes will need to be taken on the material or that material will need to be analyzed.  Then, I will share my experience at the curling center.  I will probably analyze how I did, but it will not be in a formal scientific way.  This information strategy approach seems to make sense for my project.

Before working through Macrorie's I-SEARCH, I wanted read more about I-SEARCH.  According to Macrorie, the most unique part of I-search is that the students select their own topics (Doll, 2003).  I would agree, it is important for learners to get excited about what they are about discover.  This also starts a process of pre-searching.

Reflection Moment:  The reason why I picked this assignment over the other is because I wanted to research my own topic.  This is an important lesson for teachers to learn, because I spend a lot of time working with students who say:  "My teacher wants me to research ____, and I am just not that interested in that topic."


In examining Doll's paper for evidence that I-SEARCH is successful, I came across some compelling evidence that strongly suggested I-SEARCH is both flexible and non-linear.  

          "... it is a nonlinear process that allows the media specialist and teacher to tailor the I-Search
          to each unique unit according to student learning goals and content" (Tallman, 2002).

In another article, The teacher-librarian as action researcher, Tallman explains that the I-SEARCH method is an essential part of information literacy and provides excellent outcomes (Tallman, 2001)  

Reflection Moment:  I am convinced that the I-SEARCH is an acceptable approach.  Both Doll and Tallman raved about its flexibility.  Three unexpected discoveries were made while reading the articles.  First discovery is that, seemingly, the media specialists love this approach.  I am glad to see that because I am a visual learner; more on that later.  The second discovery is the action learner.  Tallman phrased the term "action research."  I feel like I am going to be a reporter on the street for this project.  I like that term because, so many times, the general population thinks of research as a sit-down-reading process.  Lastly, Doll explained that I-SEARCH is a meta-cognitive process.  This is a reflection on how learners learn.  Okay, I am convinced; let's do I-SEARCH! 

References


Doll, C. (2003). Ken Macrorie’s I-Search Model. School Library Monthly, 19(6), 24-42. Retrieved on 01/27/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=502898579&site=ehost-live.
 
Martin, J., & Tallman, J. (2001). The teacher-librarian as action researcher. Teacher Librarian, 29(2), 8-10.  Retrieved on 01/27/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=502884594&site=ehost-live.



Tallman, Julie. "I-Search." E-mail received October 1, 2002.

Selecting the Rock

The first step in I-SEARCH, selecting a topic, can be broken down into three components.
  1. Exploring a Topic
  2. Discussing Ideas
  3. Browsing Resources
In the first blog, I already talked about selecting the topic.  I like the term "explore."  Reiterating what I said in the first blog, research is an action process, while explore exemplifies an action.  Also, the term excites me personally when someone says we are going to explore something.

In discussing ideas, I found myself pacing around the room contemplating whether I should narrow my topic to only one aspect of curling.  I began the thought about researching the rules of curling, but felt that would be too narrow.  I thought about doing a paper about the history of curling, but that would not teach me how to curl.  At that point, I realized that I need to link my thoughts to "what does one need to know before they take to the ice and curl?"  I consider my thoughts here as part of the intrapersonal learning process.  As I pictured in my mind how these papers might "look" as they were completed, I felt it was time to make a mind concept map which might clear things up a bit.  The mind concept map reinforces my visual learning and mathematical learning styles.  Librarians have been utilizing mind maps for research to break down complex subjects (Murley, 2007).  Murley states a mind map has some advantages of over traditional outlines in that they can include pictures, are non-linear, and develop branches of subtopics (Murley, 2007).

The following figure demonstrates that map.


Wow!  I think that looks nice.  I can now research my paper in segments.  I can find supportive information from different resources about each segment.  I still do not have the proper terminology, but when I go to look at resources, I can develop terminology and search terms.

I decided to do a quick Google search and Wikipedia search about curling.  Here are some of the resource links I gathered:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curling
http://www.curlingbasics.com/

Reflection Moment:  Should I be using Wikipedia for background information or information literacy?  Well, after reading Using Wikipedia to Teach Information Literacy by Jennings, I have no doubt that librarians should teach how to use Wikipedia.

          "by utilizing Wikipedia as a teaching instrument, librarians can help remove he stigma 
          from this resource and instill in students the tools and abilities necessary to be critical 
          thinkers and lifelong learners in using all information sources." - (Jenings, 2008)

Jennings points out that utilizing Wikipedia follows ACRL standards 1-5 and, in the article, gives the specifics.  I felt this is a really awesome article for evidence as why to use Wikipedia for information literacy.  So, yes, I will accept Wikipedia for background information.
If I had more time, I would want to find books about curling.  I found out that Ancilla College has no books on curling.  Hmm... I need to correct that problem.  Time to switch to another library, let's try the Plymouth Public library:
Curling for dummies by Bob Weeks  :         796.964 WEE   2006
For the love of curling Annalise Bekkering : 796.964 BEK   2007
I find it hard to believe that this library only has two books on curling!

While I did fully read these articles, I was taking mental flashes of the information segments.  This matches with my visual learning, and possibly with linguist learning.  A full discussion on my learning style will be included in the next blog.

I feel I have completed the I-SEARCH step selecting the topic. 

Reflection Moment:  Selecting one's own topic is part of the I-SEARCH process, but the learner needs to understand some information literacy practices.  Just saying "discuss ideas" does not equate to the practice of narrowing or broadening a topic.  Browsing resources might be overwhelming to a user.  Maybe recommending sources to a learner would help limit the confusion, or "research anxiety."  I consider myself an experienced researcher; therefore, broad directions, such as discussing ideas, and browsing resources do not intimidate me.  A college student might be a little overwhelmed by where to start looking for information.  I am still enjoying this process, and still think it is logical.  A librarian can refine it to the research level of the learner.   

References

Jennings, E. (2008). Using Wikipedia to Teach Information Literacy. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 15(4), 432-437. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=llf&AN=502937604&site=ehost-live.

Murley, D. (2007). Mind Mapping Complex Information. Law Library Journal, 99(1), 175-183. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from

   

Am I Skip or a Sweeper?

This post will be about determining what type of learner am I and what type of learning I prefer.

As you already read from my first two posts, I do a lot of reflection, and intrapersonal thinking.  I try to think about multiple ways to approach a problem before starting out.  At the same time, I am very visual.  In the morning, while laying in bed before starting my day, I visualize what I am going to do during my day.  I visualize how this blog will turn out.  My wife can tell that I am thinking without even looking at me, she tells me: "Paul stop thinking; go to sleep."  I ask her how she knows I am thinking; she says my breathing changes.  I do this during the day at times.  I will often just stare at something, or do something like type this blog, and visualize the occurrence.  I also have an anxiety problem, which causes me to replay daily events in my mind over and over.  Additionally, I have what I consider a semi-eidetic memory.  This is what saved me in pharmacy school.  If there is a picture on the page, I remember the page number and the information in relevance to the picture.  I remember an instance in the hospital when the emergency room called down in a frantic voice needing to know the I.V. rate to give a 2000 mg solu-medrol dose to give to a head trauma patient.  I knew it was on the top left-hand side of page 256 of the American Hospital Formulary book, one page after the picture showing an I.V. bag with a syringe of solu-medrol being pushed into the bag.  I can't do that all the time, but if I feel I need to know a topic backwards and forwards, I know pictures help me.  This is why I like the pictures Dr. Lamb puts on the websites.  I associate the material we learn with those pictures.  Websites do not have page numbers, but at least I know the material is somewhere with the picture.  My only criticism is that the slide shows, which are contained at the beginning of our lessons, all look the same when they first load in.  I would like to see a different introductory slide, so I could quickly go back and say that information was on that presentation.  I am also very good with numbers.  I admit I am very good in math; I think I scored a 780 on the math portion of the GRE without much studying.  The reason I feel that I am so good at math is that I have a built-in chalk board in my head.  I can draw, place numbers, see the problems, and keep track of the "carrier-over digits."  For some reason, I am attuned to doing math a different way than most.  For instance, if I am asked "What is 26 x 13."  I would write on my mental chalkboard 26 x 10= 260, and then 13 x 6 = 78, so 260 + 78 = 338.  Easy to do if one has a mental chalk board.

When performing the exercise in class to determine what type of learner I am, visual came up in both instances.  The survey exercise shows me equal in math and intrapersonel learning.  This make sense to me, as I seem to have three learning styles that work for me.  However, I prefer visual in some ways.  Although, I might also say visual with logic and reason behind it.  I am not the type of visual learner that can decipher art.  I can see patterns with logical meanings.  I guess, I am making an argument that just saying someone is a visual learner is still too general.  I believe subcategories can come into play.  I think different learning situations allow me to utilize skills given the learning environment.  I like the Kolb learning-style explanation.



Divergers
view situations from many perspectives and rely heavily upon brainstorming and generation of ideas.

Assimilators
use inductive reasoning and have the ability to create theoretical models.

Convergers
rely heavily on hypothetical-deductive reasoning.
 
Accommodators
carry out plans and experiments and adapt to immediate circumstances.         - (Koçakoğlu, 2010)

Sometimes I make things more complicated than they should be.  As I have tried to find articles for this section of the blog, I have sifted through articles trying to find evidence of some kind of mixed learning styles.  None of the articles I came across want to approach that subject.  All the study participants fit nice and cleanly into categories.  I DON'T LIKE THAT!  Something seems very 'fishy' here.  I did not have the time to look at the psychology databases.  Surely, somebody has written a paper on "I am not a Diverger; I am not an Assimilator; I am not a Converger; I am not an Accomodator; I am ME."  Maybe I need to write that paper :).

How does this play out in information inquiry?  I would say, I dance.  You probably think I have had too much go-go juice.  What I mean by 'I dance' is that I dance between learning styles.

Dance Step 1:   Examine the possibilities from many different angles.  Are there patterns or relationships? 
Curling.  I am out on the ice.  I want to curl, but I do not how to curl.  People in the stands are going to laugh at me if I fall on my face as I curl.  What do I need to know to curl?  Replay the Olympics tape in my brain:  the Canadians are out on the ice.  They have sweepers and a team leader pointing directions.  I see their footware.  I see a circle with a bulls eye.  I see the commentators talking about rocks pushing out other rocks.  There is a device that measures the distance from the bulls eye. - Intrapersonal Reflection Learning and Mentally Visual  Learning:  picture the question    

Dance Step 2:   Consider where they may lead mentally.  Draw connections between materials.
Mental Chalkboard time, classify this information:  Equipment, Strategy, Duties of Players, Scoring.  Abstract thinking:  History of curling? - Visual and Mathematical Categorization of Information

Dance Step 3:   Argue with myself as to which way I want to proceed.
What is a good way to proceed with this paper?  History - Argument for:  Adds more substance to the material, possibly why it has developed into the sport it is today.  Argument against:  Why add this information?  It does not have much to do with the actual process of curling. - Intrapersonal Reflection

Dance Step 4:   Form a search strategy.  Analyze the weakness in the strategy.  Always wonder if there is a better strategy.
Search the books.  Oh no!  The library does not have enough books on the information.  Analyze the date of the material.  Wow, the best book is 2007.  Is five-year-old information good enough?  Where else can I find the information? - Mathematical Strategical

Dance Step 5:  Gather information.  Analyze the information.
Okay, I got all my articles, books, videos, etc.  What does the information mean?  How do I put it together to make a coherent piece? - Intrapersonal Reflection / Mathematical Organization

Dance Step 6:  Presentation.
I need to figure out a good way to present the information.  I do not want the audience to be bored.  I will picture myself giving the presentation.  Play version 1 in my mind:  I am reading to an audience... they look bored.  Play version 2 in my mind:  I am using a PowerPoint.  Is that going to work for curling?  Hmm... Play version 3 in my mind:  Bring in an sweeper broom.  What am I going to do with it?  There is no ice in the classroom, but this could still be interesting.  Think about that some more.  Play version 4:  Bring in a curling rock, okay what you going to do with that?  Think about that some more.  Play version 5:  Take them to a curling ring.  Yeah, I like that, but is that feasible?  Play version 6:  Get a shuffle board, modify it with a bulls eye, and demonstrate using shuffle board equipment.  Hmm... I'll need to think about that.  Play version 7:  Make a video of myself curling in order to explain curling.  I could if I had access to the rink, but I do not.  Play version 8:  Find a curling computer game and explain curling utilizing a game.  Possible, but not sure.  Play version 9: ...  As you can see, this step plays over and over in my mind. - Visual Mental

The next step is not part of the Information Inquiry, but I did it as a student and will perform it as a teacher.  The reason I did it as a student was to become a better student.

Dance Step 7:  Reflect and evaluate if what I did worked.
I presented the material.  I had trouble in area X.  I wonder if there was another way I could have presented the material.  Conversely, that went really well, and I need to remember that is a good way to present X.  I could tell by the audiences faces that I had connected.  The survey after class told me I did this either really well or poorly. - Intrapersonal Learning with some visual components as well as some mathematical strategy

I believe this is an important step not only to understand if the students learned what they were supposed to learn, but also for learning to be a good teacher. 

Okay, I hope that gives everyone insight into my learning styles.

God help you all for trying to understand me, because my wife sometimes has a hard enough time doing so.

References

Doolan, L., & Honigsfeld, A. (2000). Illuminating the new standards with learning style: striking a perfect match. Clearing House, 73(5), 274-278. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=507696542&site=ehost-live.

Koçakoğlu, M. (2010). Determining the Learning Styles of Elementary School (1st-8th Grade) Teachers. International Online Journal Of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 54-64. Retrieved on 01/31/2013 from
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy2.ulib.iupui.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eft&AN=49162695&site=ehost-live.

Image:
Enders A, Brandt Z. Mapping disability-relevant resources. Map. Journal of Disability Policy Studies [serial online]. Spring 2007;17(4):227. Available from: Academic Search Premier, Ipswich, MA. Accessed December 14, 2007.